What follows was written in my book Shamanism as a Global Cultural Value System and its Antithesis Apostolic Culture. That brook was published in 2007, what follows is even more relevant today that, when it was first published.
In January 2011, the world saw in the corporate media what were called spontaneous and indigenous uprisings in North Africa and throughout the Middle East. In April 2011 an article was published in the New York Times headlined: ― A number of the groups and individuals directly involved in the revolts and reforms sweeping the region, including the April 6 Youth Movement in Egypt, the Bahrain Center for Human Rights and grass-roots activists like Entsar Qadhi, a youth leader in Yemen, received training and financing.
from groups like the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute and Freedom House, a nonprofit human rights organization based in Washington. The article went further and reported on the US National Endowment for Democracy (NED); The Republican and Democratic institutes are loosely affiliated with the Republican and Democratic Parties. They were created by Congress and are financed through the National Endowment for Democracy, which was set up in 1983 to channel grants for promoting democracy in developing nations. The National Endowment receives about $100 million annually from Congress. Freedom House also gets the bulk of its money from the American government, mainly from the State Department‖.( U.S. Groups Helped Nurture Arab Uprisings, The New York Times, April 14, 2011). (International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute and Freedom House).
December 3-5 2008 saw Egyptian activists from the April 6 movement in New York City, for the inaugural Alliance of Youth Movement. In New York they received training, networking opportunities, and support from AYMs corporate and US governmental sponsors, including the US State Department. James Glassman attended, as did Jared Cohen who sits on the policy planning summit along with an immense list of corporate, media, and institutional representatives. April 6 would then go on to Serbia to train under US funded CANVAS, previously known as Otpor. Otpor was a primary instrument in the overthrow of the Serbian government in 2000. A New York Times article said of Otpor; ―well-oiled movement backed by several million dollars from the United States. Foreign Policy magazine reported in an article titled: ―Revolution U , that CANVAS assisted protesters in the ―Rose Revolution‖ of Georgia, the “Orange Revolution” of the Ukraine, and is currently working with networks from Belarus,
Myanmar (Burma), all across the Middle East and North Africa, as well as with activists in North Korea, and 50 other countries. President Vladimir Putin recently remarked, (Thursday November 20th 2014), that; ― we must prevent a color revolution in Russia‖, Putin’s comments at a meeting of his advisory Security Council on combating extremism, underlined his wariness about Russia being hit by a popular uprising like those in the former Soviet republics known as the color revolutions. Putin said: ―In the modern world extremism is being used as a geopolitical instrument and for remaking spheres of influence (see the New Middle East). We see what tragic consequences the wave of so called color revolutions led to, for us this is a lesson and a warning . We should do everything necessary to insure nothing similar ever happens in Russia‖. Putin said the United States is trying to subjugate Russia , he rightfully laid blame for the overthrow of the Moscow backed Ukrainian President at the Western powers‘ feet and he accused Washington of stoking protest‘s against him in the 2011-2012 winter protest‘s in Moscow.
Putin‘s words ring true, as I already revealed in this book(Otpor now called CANVAS, is a US funded organization which assisted protesters in the “Rose Revolution” of Georgia, the “Orange Revolution” of the Ukraine), as reported in Foreign Policy magazine see (Revolution-U).
Image: Otpor in Serbia, a prototype for future US backed color revolutions.
In February 2010, April 6 the movement, after training with CANVAS returned to Egypt along with El Baradei the UN IAEA chief.
Image: Politics of every hue indeed makes strange bedfellows. This is a photo of ElBaradei, at the time this photo was taken he was the International Atomic Energy Agency chief.
ElBaradei announced his bid for the Egyptian presidency from as early as 2010. Along with April 6 member Wael Gonim of Google, and a united front of opposition parties. ElBaradei‘s National Front For Change was at the forefront of the coalition parties. It is no mere coincidence that ElBaradei was in bed with Wael Gonim who was with Google at the time, insuring that the events of the ―Arab Spring‖, would be permanently etched in the consciousness of people since Google is the most used search engine on the planet.
Consequently if anyone would care to recall when the Arab spring was in full bloom Google was putting out Arab Spring related propaganda which was in full support of the ―peaceful protesters‖, when all along it was a sham concocted by the corporate-multinationals and their Arab dupes and ―useful idiots‖, who were the young people used, to fuel the farcical uprisings. In the run up to the Egyptian staged uprisings, the staged uprisings in Tunisia, were in full swing and some very interesting players were at work in Tunisia. January 16th 2011 Al Arabiya reported in an article that Moncef Marzouki had returned to Tunisia the article was titled; ―Tunisia reformist to head back home‖.
Moncef founded and headed the, ―Arab Commission for human Rights‖, a collaborating institution with the US NED, he participated in a World Movement for Democracy third assembly. All of the NGO‘s and assemblies named are sponsored by NED and George Soros‘ open society and USAID. After fact checking all of the info given above, it soon became apparent to me that, the United states of America and its corporate sponsors, the real owners of America, have been from the early 1900‘s, plotting and fomenting incursions throughout the earth, in many sovereign nations under the guise of ―democracy , with the Military Industrial Complex and its corporate paymasters being the immediate beneficiaries of the US incursions into other sovereign nations. Baradei is also a long standing member of the Wall Street funded International Crisis Group (ICG), other members include the then Israeli president Shimon Peres, the then governor of the bank of Israel Stanley Fisher and former Foreign Minister of Israel Shlomo Ben Ami. Other prominent ICGers are American bankers and geo-political movers and shakers, including George Soros, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Richard Armitage, Samuel Berger, and Wesley Clark. After having digested the twisted tangled web of lies and deceit that the persons named and institutions named in the preceding have lain, in their Manichean ―Globalist‖ plot it became absolutely clear to me that these people are all aligned under an agenda of a ―One World Government‖, not only for self-enrichment and aggrandizement, but some are absolutely convinced of the validity of their plot and they will succeed all in fulfilment of bible prophecy. The Western media or the ―Corporate‖, media reported that ElBaradei is anti-Israel and anti-America, given the evidence in the preceding of his memberships and affiliations in numerous NGO‘s and groups how could he be remotely anti-anything American or Israeli, since the membership of the ICG is replete with Jews and Americans a glance at their first and last names will attest to their heritage. El Baradei is no more anti-Israel than Shimon Peres, he is definitely not anti-America since the State Department is one of his paymasters. To put it succinctly ElBaradei is a stooge and a servant of the corporate financiers and Washington elites that he serves, his public ―anti-Israel or anti-American‖, statements are all designed for public consumption, those who take the time to dig a little deeper will soon discover, the monumental fraudsters that Baradei and his ilk are.
Image: The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and its partner organizations and corporate backers. A financial and ideological arm of those in the US government and their corporate paymasters, who are dedicated to the goal of Globalism. The partner organizations and financial backers of NED are some of the most known names in their respective spheres of endeavor, for instance Brookings Institute is a ‗think tank‖ that concerns itself with foreign policy formation, and most of their recommendations or projections, are actual policies already being enacted or on the books in the American governmental apparatus. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), is another huge decider of American foreign policy, its founders and financiers are an interesting lot to say the least, one of the founders is Colonel Edward Mandelhouse John Foster Dulles (of Kuhn, Loeb & Co.), and Allen Dulles (also of Kuhn, Loeb & Co). The CFR was officially founded on July 29, 1921. Money for the founding came from J.P. Morgan, Bernard Baruch, Otto Kahn, Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg, and John D. Rockefeller, among others. The funding for the RIIA in London came primarily from the Astor family. An appropriate quote from War on Syria is in order here: ―US Senators John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and Joe Lieberman issued a joint statement declaring that Bashar al- Assad had ―lost the legitimacy to remain in power in Syria.‖ They continued by stating: Rather than hedging our bets or making excuses for the Assad regime, it is time for the United States, together with our allies in Europe and around the world, to align ourselves unequivocally with the Syrian people in their peaceful demand for a democratic government. The US Senators‘ statements remain unequivocally dishonest, as McCain and Graham are both members of the International Republican Institute, an organization openly implicated by the New York Times in funding opposition groups who took part in the ―Arab Spring. Likewise, Lieberman is a member of the Neo-Conservative lobbying firm deceptively named the ―Foundation for Defense of Democracies(FDD), which features a host of Projects for a New American Century (PNAC) signatories including William Kristol, Richard Perle, James Woolsey, and Paula Dobriansky, as well as Council on Foreign Relations members, Newt Gingrich and Charles Krauthammer‖. The power of the corporate elite is concentrated in the Bilderberg group, as I will show here using their words as the proof to substantiate my claims. Daniel Estulin investigated and researched the Bilderberg group for well over 14 years. Estulin‘s The True Story of The Bilderberg Group ―Slowly, one by one, I have penetrated the layers of secrecy surrounding the Bilderberg Group, but I could not have done this without help of conscientious objectors‘ from inside, as well as outside, the Group‘s membership. Estulin describes the Bilderberg group as a Shadow one World Government . Estulin detailed how in 1954 the worlds power elite congregated . The most powerful men in the world met for the first time, in Oosterbeek, Netherlands, debated the future of the world, and decided to meet annually in secret. They called themselves the Bilderberg Group . The membership of the group consists of a who‘s who of the world‘s elite and powerful such as David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Gordon Brown, Angela Merkel, Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, Larry Summers, Tim Geithner, Lloyd Blankfein, George Soros, Donald Rumsfeld, Rupert Murdoch, other heads of state, influential senators, congressmen and parliamentarians, Pentagon and NATO brass, members of European royalty, selected media figures, and invited others, even President Obama and many of his ―top-officials‖, have been present at Bilderberg conferences. Always well represented are top figures from the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), IMF, World Bank, Trilateral Commission, EU, and powerful central bankers from the Federal Reserve, the ECB‘s Jean-Claude Trichet, and Bank of England‘s Mervyn King.
The objective of the Bilderberg group is to supplant, nation-state sovereignty by a global government controlled by corporations that are empowered by a militarized police state case in point Ferguson Missouri. It will become increasingly difficult for the average citizen to distinguish between the police and military, combat fatigues and armored vehicles will be and is already fast becoming standard issue for police departments globally, and particularly in the western hemisphere. Estulin wrote the following in his book: ―Imagine a private club where presidents, prime ministers, international bankers and generals rub shoulders, where gracious royal chaperones ensure everyone gets along, and where the people running the wars, markets, and Europe and America say what they never dare say in public.‖ ―Early in its history, Bilderbergers decided ―to create an ‗Aristocracy of purpose‘ between Europe and the United States (to reach consensus to rule the world on matters of) policy, economics, and (overall) strategy. NATO was essential for their plans – to ensure ―perpetual war (and) nuclear blackmail to be used as necessary. Then proceed to loot the planet, achieve fabulous wealth and power, and crush all challengers to keep it‖ (quoted from from Global Research). The rules of the Bilderberg groups steering committee are the following: ―the invited guests must come alone; no wives, girlfriends, husbands or boyfriends. Personal assistants (meaning security, bodyguards, CIA or other secret service protectors) cannot attend the conference and must eat in a separate hall. (Also) The guests are explicitly forbidden from giving interviews to journalists‖ . An elite private club comprised of a global elite that rules the world and are sworn to secrecy . Estulin wrote the following suggesting that Bill Clinton was ―allowed‘, to become President of the US for the specific purpose of: There, David Rockefeller told (him) why the North American Free Trade Agreement….was a Bilderberg priority and that the group needed him to support it.
The next year, Clinton was elected president . Clinton attended the meeting in 1991 on January 1st 1994 NAFTA went into effect. The Bilderberg group has a Grand Design , for the world which is outlined in the following. a One World Government (World Company) with a single, global marketplace, policed by one world army, and financially regulated by one World (Central) Bank‘ using one global currency.‖ Their objectives are: – one international identify (observing) one set of universal values; – centralized control of world populations by mind control; in other words, controlling world public opinion; – a New World Order with no middle class, only ―rulers and servants (serfs), and, of course, no democracy; – a zero-growth society, without prosperity or progress, only greater wealth and power for the rulers; – manufactured crises and perpetual wars; – absolute control of education to program the public mind and train those chosen for various roles; – centralized control of all foreign and domestic policies; one size fits all globally; – using the UN as a de facto world government imposing a UN tax on ―world citizens; expanding NAFTA and WTO globally; making NATO a world military; – imposing a universal legal system; and a global welfare state where obedient slaves will be rewarded and non-conformists targeted for extermination. A prominent partner organization of the Bilderberg group is the Council on Foreign relations. Edward Mandell House a CFR foundation member was Woodrow Wilson‘s, during House‘ tenure the Federal reserve Act was passed in December 1931, extending the power to create money to bankers, the 16th Amendment was ratified in February creating the federal income tax to provide a revenue stream to pay for government debt service. The Trilateral Commission is another key organization that advances the Globalist agenda. Founded by David Rockefeller a prominent Bilderberger and a CFR Chairmen Emeritus, Rockefeller funds and supports the following organizations: nearly all presidential candidates of both parties; leading senators and congressmen; key members of the fourth estate and their bosses; and top officials of the FBI, CIA, NSA, defense establishment, and other leading government agencies, including state, commerce, the judiciary and treasury. The global super-state advocacy of the CFR entails America and other western powers ceding their sovereignty to a world power. The founder of CFR was a member of Roosevelt‘s ―Brain Trust‖. In 1950, his son, James, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee: We shall have world government whether or not you like it – by conquest or consent. Henry Kissinger intoned at the 1992 Bilderberg conference that: Today, Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow, they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence.
It is then that all people of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil….individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by their world government‖. The United Nations an instrumental organization in the power elites push to usher in a one world government, according to Estulin was formed by: ―the UN began with a group of CFR members called the Informal Agenda Group. The original UN proposal was drafted by members of the CFR. According to Professor William Donhoff author of ―Who Rules America‖ the CFR operates in micro groups of twenty five operatives: ―small groups of about twenty-five, who bring together leaders from the six conspirator categories (industrialists, financiers, ideologues, military, professional specialists – lawyers, medical doctors, etc. – and organized labor) for detailed discussions of specific topics in the area of foreign affairs‖. Domhoff emphasized that : ―The Council on Foreign Relations, while not financed by government, works so closely with it that it is difficult to distinguish Council action stimulated by government from autonomous actions. (Its) most important sources of income are leading corporations and major foundations, most notably the Rockefeller Foundation, the Ford Foundation and the Carnegie Foundation are key corporate sponsors of the CFR. Richard Salant former CBS news president outlined the corporate media‘s role in the twisted tangled web of global corporate hegemony: ―Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have.‖ CFR influence in the administrative process of America and indeed the western hemisphere is staggering to say the least: The National Security Act of 1947 established the office of Secretary of Defense.‖ Since then, 14 DOD secretaries have been CFR members. Since 1940, every Secretary of State, except James Byrnes, has been a CFR member and/or Trilateral Commission (TC) one. For the past 80 years, ―Virtually every key US National Security and Foreign Policy Advisor has been a CFR member. Nearly all top generals and admirals have been CFR members. Many presidential candidates were/are CFR members, including Herbert Hoover, Adlai Stevenson, Dwight Eisenhower, John Kennedy, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter (also a charter TC member), George HW Bush, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, and John McCain. Numerous CIA directors were/are CFR members, including Richard Helmes, James Schlesinger, William Casey, William Webster, Robert Gates, James Woolsey, John Deutsch, George Tenet, Porter Goss, Michael Hayden, and Leon Panetta. Many Treasury Secretaries were/are CFR members, including Douglas Dillon, George Schultz, William Simon, James Baker, Nicholas Brady, Lloyd Bentsen, Robert Rubin, Henry Paulson, and Tim Geithner. When presidents nominate Supreme Court candidates, the CFR‘s ―Special Group, Secret Team‖ or advisors vet them for acceptability. Presidents, in fact, are told who to appoint, including designees to the High Court and most lower ones. The dumbing down of the world‘s population is not limited to the world of pop-culture but permeates every facet of the human experience.
Above left: Stepan Banderas.
Stepan Banderas is a World War II leader, of the Ukrainian Nationalist Independence movement. Bandera naturally in contemporary times is a polarizing figure, revered by nationalist groups in Ukraine like Right Sector and Svoboda. Banderas was a nationalist whose organization was allied to Nazi Germany for a time, I must say here that they were also imprisoned by the Germans. Banderas was assassinated in Munich, Germany, in 1959. Right Sector ,Azov Battalion and Svoboda incorporate Ukrainian nationalist ideology and symbolism as well as Nazi i.e. Nordic symbolism and mythological symbiology, such as runes et al in their tattoos and flags. These are the groups that the US, is actively supporting both materially and militarily in Ukraine at present. The leaders in the US government demonstrate their, rabid hegemonic ambitions which, they realize time and again through the use of neo-Nazi proxies in Eastern Europe and al-Qaeda and other such groups in the Middle East .
US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland together with Neo Nazi Svoboda leader Oleh Tyahnybok (left), right Ukrainian Prime Minister Arselli Yatsenyuk. (Photo credit Reuters). Nuland stated that: ―We have invested more than 5 billion dollars to help Ukraine to achieve these and other goals. … We will continue to promote Ukraine to the future it deserves.
Above right: John McCain with Neo-Nazi leader of Svoboda Oleh Tyanybok left center. Andriy Parubiy , co-founder of the Neo-Nazi Social-National Party of Ukraine (subsequently renamed Svoboda) was appointed Secretary of the National Security and National Defense Committee, a key position which oversees the Ministry of Defense, the Armed Forces, Law Enforcement, National Security and Intelligence. The RNBOU is a central decision-making body. While it is formally headed by the president, it is run by the Secretariat with a staff of 180 people including defense, intelligence and national security experts. Parubiy is one of the main leaders behind the Orange Revolution in 2004. His organization was funded by the United States and its western allies, mainly the NATO allied nations. Both Andriy Parubiy and Oleh Tyahnybok are students of Stepan Bandera.
Neo Nazi‘s march in Ukraine in honor of Stepan Banderas, his photo prominently displayed above.
Professor Michel Chossudovsky wrote in an article on Global Research posted on February 26th 2015: that According to the New York Times, ―The United States and the European Union have embraced the revolution here as another lowering of democracy, a blow to authoritarianism and kleptocracy in the former Soviet space.‖ ( After Initial Triumph, Ukraine‘s Leaders Face Battle for Credibility, NY Times. com, March 1, 2014). The US using their pre-eminence in NATO and their influence over the EU initiated the present Ukrainian crisis during the, so called ―Orange Revolution‖. The present war footing that the US is on with Russia, does not bode well for the planet, since both these ―super-powers‖, possess awesome nuclear arsenals, that if activated will spell absolute annihilation for the Earth‘s populace. The insanity of the present American government‘s expansionist policy in Eastern Europe using Ukraine as its gateway is a step on the threshold of a possible nuclear showdown, between Russia and the US, which will most likely involve China and Iran. America‘s NATO allies all fit the biblical description of Ezekiel 38‘s war of Gog and Magog.
Nowhere in the corporate western media are these facts espoused. The fact that America‘s Ukrainian proxy government, is integrated by neo-Nazi‘s seems not to ruffle the feathers of the elite, within the US government. How then can the US government claim to be the vanguard of , human rights while bolstering the openly Nazi-nativistic regime in Kiev?
According to the BBC the Azoz Battalion is not a neo-Nazi organization. The photo above shows members of the Azov Battalion, posing with a Nazi flag, the NATO flag and the banner of their battalion.
Above is the Sector Right.
On Thursday, December 4th 2014, Russia‘s President Vladimir Putin addressed the Federal Assembly, including State Duma deputies, members of the Federal Council, the heads of the Constitutional and Supreme courts, regional governors, heads of Russia‘s traditional faiths and public figures at the Kremlin in Moscow.
President Vladimir accused the US and its NATO allies of seeking to carve up Russia, destroy its economy, and to punish it for becoming strong, Putin stressed that Russia would rise to any challenge. In a fiercely patriotic state of the union speech, the Kremlin leader defended his annexation of Ukraine‘s Crimea peninsula, praised the Russian people for their strength, accused the West of ―pure cynicism‖ in Ukraine and said that Russians must develop their own economy in the wake of economic sanctions.
Putin accused the west of trying to bring another iron curtain down around Russia. ―I‘m certain that if all this did not take place, (the Ukraine crisis), they would come up with another reason to contain Russia‘s growing capabilities‖. Putin claimed that Crimea which his troops seized after a Moscow- backed president was toppled in Kiev held sacred meaning for Russians forever. Putin is still riding a wave of high popularity since his rise to power amid Russia‘s currency collapse and default. As a result of the precarious What follows is from the Ethiopian book of Enoch, pertaining to Gog and Magog. ―When Alexander was king and had subdued countries and cities, and had arrived in the East, he saw on the confines of the East those men who are of the children of Japheth i.e. (Aryans, Caucasians or Europeans). They were more wicked and unclean than all other dwellers in the earth; filthy peoples of hideous appearance who ate mice and the creeping things of the earth and snakes and scorpions.
They never buried the bodies of their dead, and they ate as dainties the children which women aborted and the after birth. People ignorant of God and unacquainted with the power of reason, but who lived in this world without understanding like ravening beasts. The names given for the European tribes are as follows: ―Gog, Magog, Nawal, Eshkanaz aka Ashkenaz, Denaphar, Paktaye, Welotaye, Humnaye, Parzaye, Daklaye, Thaubelaye, Darmetaye, Kawkebaye, Dogmen (Cynocephali), Emderatha, Garmido, Cannibals, Therkaye, Alanaye, Pisilon, Denkaye, Saltraye‖. The tribes and clannish alliances mentioned above, though found in mythology are instructive to where I am going in this portion. Gog and Magog, is not only mentioned in mythological accounts of the Aryan, Nordic, Saxon and Slav people‘s among other in Western and Eastern Europe, Gog and Magog is also spoken of in the Torah and Quran. Needless to say that in this work my primary point of reference is the Holy Bible, it is yet fascinating to see that all three books, when read objectively actually complement and bear up each other, pointing in my view to their divine origin i.e. inspired by, ―The One True God‖. situation in the Ukraine, Chechnya and many of the breakaway former USSR states and a ramped up US-led NATO presence in some of Russia‘s former territories , Russia‘s Ministry of Defence announced on the 3rd of December 2014, the inauguration of a new military-political entity which would take over in case of war.
In May 2014 the Russian Aggression Prevention Act (RAPA) was in the US senate (S2277), calling for the militarization of Eastern Europe and the Baltic states and the stationing of US and NATO troops close to Russia‘s borders. The Russian Aggression Prevention Act (RAPA) was in the US senate (S2277): Directs the President to: (1) implement a plan for increasing U.S. and NATO support for the armed forces of Poland, Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia, and other NATO member-states; and (2) direct the U.S. Permanent Representative to NATO to seek consideration for permanently basing NATO forces in such countries. Directs the President, to submit a plan to Congress for accelerating NATO and European missile defense efforts. In mid-July, NATO‘s Europe commander General Philip Breedlove in consultation with the Pentagon and Britain‘s Ministry of Defense, called for:―stockpiling a base in Poland with enough weapons, ammunition and other supplies to support a rapid deployment of thousands of troops against Russia‖,(RT, July 24, 2014).
He plans to recommend placing supplies — weapons, ammunition and ration packs — at the headquarters to enable a sudden influx of thousands of NATO troops‖ (Times, August 22, 2014.) As a response to NATO‘s deployments on Russia‘s borders, conducted early in November a series of war games in the sea of Barent. The Russian military tested: ―it‘s entire nuclear triad consisting of strategic bombers; submarines‖ and the ―silo-based Topol-M intercontinental ballistic missile launched from Plesetsk in Arkhangelsk Oblast‖ on November 1st. On November 18th a major resolution H. Res. 758 was introduced in the House of Representatives. situation in the Ukraine, Chechnya and many of the breakaway former USSR states and a ramped up US-led NATO presence in some of Russia‘s former territories , Russia‘s Ministry of Defense announced on the 3rd of December 2014, the inauguration of a new military-political entity which would take over in case of war. In May 2014 the Russian Aggression Prevention Act (RAPA) was in the US senate (S2277), calling for the militarization of Eastern Europe and the Baltic states and the stationing of US and NATO troops close to Russia‘s borders.
The Russian Aggression Prevention Act (RAPA) was in the US senate (S2277): Directs the President to: (1) implement a plan for increasing U.S. and NATO support for the armed forces of Poland, Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia, and other NATO member-states; and (2) direct the U.S. Permanent Representative to NATO to seek consideration for permanently basing NATO forces in such countries. Directs the President, to submit a plan to Congress for accelerating NATO and European missile defense efforts. In mid-July, NATO‘s Europe commander General Philip Breedlove in consultation with the Pentagon and Britain‘s Ministry of Defense, called for:―stockpiling a base in Poland with enough weapons, ammunition and other supplies to support a rapid deployment of thousands of troops against Russia‖,(RT, July 24, 2014). He plans to recommend placing supplies — weapons, ammunition and ration packs — at the headquarters to enable a sudden influx of thousands of NATO troops‖ (Times, August 22, 2014.) As a response to NATO‘s deployments on Russia‘s borders, conducted early in November a series of war games in the sea of Barent. The Russian military tested: ―it‘s entire nuclear triad consisting of strategic bombers; submarines‖ and the ―silo-based Topol-M intercontal .
Russian analysts say that Putin‘s statements were made out of a desire to emphasize Kiev‘s dependence on the U.S. and the EU. Viktor Militaryov, vice president of the Institute for National Strategy, told RBTH that while ―of course, the Ukrainian armed forces are not officially a NATO structure, in his statement, Putin was implying that they are not acting on their own initiative. In Militaryov‘s view, Putin was essentially saying that NATO and especially the United States ―are using Kiev and its armed forces for geopolitical provocations against Russia.‖ According to Losif Diskin, co-Chairman of the National Strategy Council, Putin‘s statements can be interpreted to mean that the U.S. is trying to drive a wedge between Russia and Europe using the Ukrainian armed forces. intercontinental ballistic missile launched from Plesetsk in Arkhangelsk Oblast‖ on November 1st. On November 18th a major resolution H. Res. 758 was introduced in the House of Representatives. Alexander Golts, a military expert and editor-in-chief of the independent Internet portal The Daily Journal, has a different take on Putin‘s statements. According to Golts, Putin unwittingly presented Russia as a party to the conflict in Ukraine. ―Military actions are under way on Ukrainian territory, not Russian territory. If in the Russian president‘s opinion, the purpose of the military action is to contain Russia, then who is fighting against the voluntary battalions there? , Golts asked Putin: (From Russia beyond The Headlines : Foreign legion‘ Ukraine January 27, 2015 Alexei Timofeichev, RBTH Russian experts react to Putin‘s comments, which NATO calls ―nonsense.) The claim that Putin‘s statements are nonsense shatters when taken in context.
A clip emerging amid the devastation of Mariupol from a Ukrainian news outlet showing a female news reporter approaching what she thinks is a Ukrainian soldier he is dressed in Ukrainian military fatigues and carrying an AK47, she asks him ―what happened here? , The man immediately rushes to cover his face as the still of the clip shows below, speaking in a clearly audible tone he shout‘s ―get out of my face‖, in unmistakable American English. Who then is the Obama administration attempting to deceive? The alternative media were reporting this all along; the exact same pattern repeats itself, in Iraq and Syria, American Special Forces embedded in each and every conflict zone only to be denied ad-infinitum until the next Edward Snowden blows the whistle.
Image: The American (Special Forces or mercenary), dressed as a Ukrainian soldier, hides his face from the camera. Zero Hedge on the 25th of January posted an article which I will quote here : ‘With daily reportage of the invasion‘ of Russian military forces into Ukraine territory (admittedly unconfirmed by NATO), this clip raises many questions about American involvement in the ongoing conflict – most of all, was the US involved in ―staging‖ the Mariupol massacre, and if so it is clear who should be blamed (and isolated).Of course, US troops, or at least mercs, on the ground, should not be a total surprise, since just 2 months ago, we discussed the hacked US documents that revealed the extent of undisclosed US ―lethal aid‖ being given to the Ukraine army. What was apparently left unleaked was the part of the US aid also includes US-speaking soldiers. The only question is whether US taxpayers are paying their wages’ .
Above is a shot of John McCain‘s Twitter feed. McCain posted ―Dear Vlad the Arab Spring is coming to a neighborhood near you. John McCain is taunting Putin with this post, yet it is quite telling since McCain has repeatedly , uttered the same mantra time and again. Indeed that mantra is seen in Brzezinski’s: The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and its Geo Strategic Imperatives‖. The following is from an article by Tony Cartalucci on his website Land Destroyer: ―The “shift” in logistical terms is meaningless – since any and every available amount of money, weapons, and fighters has already been fed by the US and its allies into Al Qaeda’s ranks since the conflict began – but the shift rhetorically is important. It signals America’s attempt to introduce direct military support for Al Qaeda’s Al Nusra Front and other assorted terrorist groups on the ground to counter and ultimately defeat Russian, Syrian, and Iranian efforts. This will also leave virtually no capable force on the battlefield to counter ISIS. The US hopes that this, “power move” – the abominable assault with terrorists on a coalition demonstrably attempting to fight Al Qaeda and ISIS in the region – will force Russia to the negotiating table. However, Russia can do nothing of the sort. With the death of General Hamedani so clearly benefiting the United States – the conflict is of a clear existential nature. Failure to stop these terrorists in Syria and they are headed next to Iran, then Caucasus Mountains into Russia – and as far as China is concerned – across Central Asia and into its vast Xinjiang region.
The Newsweek cover above is a great example of the type of social engineering employed by the American media. The cover subject Vladimir Putin Russia‘s current President, is dehumanized becoming the impersonal it‘, The Pariah, the West‘s Public Enemy Number One . With his deathly grey pallor and surrounded by a matte black background, Putin hearkens to mind one of the terminator‘s hunting Arnold Schwarzenegger’s character in Terminator II, specifically the blond terminator that morphed into a police officer. The idea here is clearly to influence mass perception of Putin as a dangerous killer who should be feared and loathed.
Figure: The photo above is from FP magazine article entitled Revolution U. The article is revealing on multiple levels and I will quote liberally from the piece, as a means of strengthening the claims made in this essay. First though an article in the Washington Post written by Michael Faulkner in 2004, wherein he stated that the US was ―meddling‖, in the Ukraine. Here are some excerpts from his piece: Washington Post in an op-ed titled, Meddling‘ In Ukraine Democracy is not an American plot, that: Did Americans meddle in the internal affairs of Ukraine? Yes. The American agents of influence would prefer different language to describe their activities , democratic assistance, democracy promotion, civil society support, etc. But their work, however labelled, seeks to influence political change in Ukraine. The U.S. Agency for International Development, the National Endowment for Democracy and a few other foundations sponsored certain U.S. organizations, including Freedom House, the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute, the Solidarity Center, the Eurasia Foundation, Internews and several others to provide small grants and technical assistance to Ukrainian civil society. The European individual European countries and the Soros-funded International Renaissance Foundation.
The Guardian carried a 2004 article titled: US campaign behind the turmoil in Kiev, But while the gains of the orange bedecked chestnut revolution are Ukraine‘s the campaign is an American creation, a sophisticated and brilliantly conceived exercise in Western mass marketing and branding, that in four countries in four years, has been used to try to save rigged elections and topple unsavory regimes. Funded and organized by the US government, deploying US consultancies, pollsters, diplomats, the two big American parties and US non-government organizations, the campaign was first used in Europe in Belgrade in 2000 to beat Slobodan Milosevic at the ballot box. Richard Miles, the US ambassador in Belgrade, played a key role. And by last year, as US ambassador in Tbilisi, he repeated the trick in Georgia, coaching Mikhail Saakashvili in how to bring down Eduard Shevardnadze.
The American corporate hierarchy and their sponsored proxies are listed on the list above. It includes, Otpor top right, Bersh, Project Middle East Democracy, Prachatai and Free Malaysia Today. These are the corporate backers of the, ―Arab Spring‖ and all the ―Color Revolutions‖, mentioned previously. So called revolutions masterminded from boardrooms and mass marketed through their NGO‘s to whomever, they‘ve recruited for their cause. The scenario sounds like something out of Robert Ludlums ,The Lazarus Vendetta, but in this case his book was inspired by our present reality. Ten months after the success in Belgrade, the US ambassador in Minsk, Michael Kozak, a veteran of similar operations in central America, notably in Nicaragua, organized a near identical campaign to try to defeat the Belarus hardman, Alexander Lukashenko.
That one failed. There will be no Kostunica in Belarus,‖ the Belarus president declared, referring to the victory in Belgrade. But experience gained in Serbia, Georgia and Belarus has been invaluable in plotting to beat the regime of Leonid Kuchma in Kiev. The operation – engineering democracy through the ballot box and civil disobedience – is now so slick that the methods have matured into a template for winning other people‘s elections‖. The exact tactics were repeated during the so called Arab Spring‖ and the Euromaidan‖, in 2013-2014, in Europe. Steve Clemons wrote in The Atlantic that: At an earlier session, Senator Udall said that those who believed that the Arab Spring was an organic revolution from within these countries were wrong — and that the West and NATO in particular had been primary drivers of results in Libya — and that the West had helped animate and move affairs in Egypt. Udall provocatively added Syria to that list as well. The following is the article I promised of course excerpt‘s only the article can be read at http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/02/17/revolution-u-2/. Written by Tina Rosenberg February 17th 2011 for Foreign Policy (FP) magazine.
The botched April 6 protests, the leaders realized in their aftermath, had been an object lesson in the limits of social networking as a tool of democratic revolution. Facebook could bring together tens of thousands of sympathizers online, but it couldn‘t organize them once they logged off. It was a useful communication tool to call people to — well, to what? The April 6 leaders did not know the answer to this question. So they decided to learn from others who did. In the summer of 2009, Mohamed Adel, a 20-year-old blogger and April 6 activist, went to Belgrade, Serbia‖. In the piece above social media was the tool used to mobilize the masses , mainly students and working class people who were internet savvy . The social media‖, aspect is where Wael Ghonim of Google.
Ghonim above was jailed in fact it was claimed that he went missing, during the protest‘s in Egypt when he was released days later he became instantly famous, an easy feat for a Google marketing executive. Ghonim was linked to the April, six movement, the Muslim Brotherhood and some groupings of the working class. The following is the continuation of the FP article: The Serbian capital is home to the Center for Applied Non Violent Action and Strategies, or CANVAS, an organization run by young Serbs who had cut their teeth in the late 1990s student uprising against Slobodan Milosevic. After ousting him, they embarked on the ambitious project of figuring out how to translate their success to other countries .
They have worked with democracy advocates from more than 50 countries. They have advised groups of young people on how to take on some of the worst governments in the world — and in Georgia, Ukraine, Syria-occupied Lebanon, the Maldives, and now Egypt, those young people won .
The April 6 Youth Movement, along with a similar group called Kefaya, became the most important organizers of the 18-day peaceful uprising that culminated in President Hosni Mubarak‘s departure on Feb. 11. The April 6 Movement and Kifaya are the groups that have led the charge in actually getting protesters organized and onto the streets, a Feb. 3 report from the geopolitical analysis group Stratfor said. The tactics were straight out of CANVAS‘s training curriculum. I got trained in how to conduct peaceful demonstrations, how to avoid violence, and how to face violence from the security forces … and also how to organize to get people on the streets, Adel said of his experience with the Serbs, in an interview with Al Jazeera English on Feb. 9. We were quite amazed they did so much with so little, Srdja Popovic, one of CANVAS‘s leaders, told me. Revolutions are often seen as spontaneous, Ivan Marovic, a former CANVAS trainer, told me in Washington a few years ago. It looks like people just went into the street. But it‘s the result of months or years of preparation. It is very boring until you reach a certain point, where you can organize mass demonstrations or strikes. If it is carefully planned, by the time they start, everything is over in a matter of weeks. CANVAS is hardly the first organization to teach people living under dictatorship the skills they can use to overthrow it; the U.S. government and its allies have funded democracy-promotion organizations around the world since the early years of the Cold War. Living under two dictatorships — Chile under Augusto Pinochet and Nicaragua under the Sandinistas and visiting perhaps a dozen others, I had seen armies of them at work and served as an election monitor myself. But I had never seen anything like CANVAS. There, we have credible evidence from the players themselves, about who, funded, trained and educated them on how to bring about, a staged revolution.
The United States President Barack Obama was recently interviewed by Fareed Zakaria, during the interview he admitted that the US, had brokered a deal to transition power in Ukraine. Timothey Alexander Guzman told Sputnik that: Obama‘s statement is reiterating something that the world public opinion already knew , the US was involved in the coup of ex-Ukrainian President] Viktor Yanukovych from the start. History shows us that the US has overthrown numerous governments in Latin America, Asia and Africa and replaced them with leaders that ruled with a fascist ideology that proved useful for Washington‘s geopolitical interests. Law Professor at the University of Illinois College of Law Francis Boyle said the following of Obama‘s Ukraine strategy : I think he (Obama), has made it very clear that he is going ,to continue to take a Brzezinski hard-lined approach toward Ukraine and Russia and that there are not going to be any compromises at all, and effectively he expects President Putin to throw in a towel, capitulate, whatever, it does not appear to me there is any ground for negotiations in light of what President Obama at least said publicly,‖ Professor Sobell made a statement that: Mr. President [Obama] should be aware that Yanukovych fled [Ukraine] because he had solid reasons to fear for his life. The hallowed Maidan was not a peaceful democratic regime change, as it was presented in Western media, but a violent putch complete with murderous acts by hired assassins. Sobell made the devastating claim that: unnamed EU officials affirm, that on February 20 snipers shot both demonstrators and police dead, in order to provoke chaos . He went even further stating that: These crimes, he continued, are not being investigated by Kiev‘s democratic — Western values regime or its Western sponsors, as today it is ok to install a Nazi-driven regime, by these means and then demand that Western tax- payers support it.
Images: Above left a promotion announcing the Wales NATO summit of 4-5 September 2014. Bottom a promotion of NATO‘s Iron Sword military exercises –involving the participation of nine member countries of the Atlantic Alliance– were launched in Lithuania in early November.
The H. Res. 758 directly accuses Russia of having invaded Ukraine and it invokes article 5 of the Washington Treaty, which is NATO‘s collective security doctrine. The resolution accuses Russia of military aggression. The resolution accuses Russia of: ―using the supply of energy for political coercion‖. The resolution advises the US President in concert with the US Congress to : ―conduct a review of the force posture, readiness, and responsibilities of the United States Armed Forces and the forces of other members of NATO to determine if the contributions and actions of each is sufficient to meet the obligations of collective self defense under article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty and to specify the measures needed to remedy any deficiencies‖ .The language of the resolution places Russia and America on a war footing, which may escalate in all out war, on any number of fronts. The present US-led NATO alliance it‘s mid-east allies and proxies, and Russia its allies, specifically China and Iran and their mid-east Shia proxies all fit the pre-conditions and prerequisites of fulfilling Ezekiel 38. H.Res.758 below is a must-read document and can be viewed in its entirety and even downloaded at: